
Policies and Ethics
Publication Ethics and Policies
Introduction
The Future Governance Systems (FGS) Book Series is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scholarly publishing through integrity, transparency, fairness, and accountability. The editorial policies of the series are guided by internationally recognized principles of publication ethics, including the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices, the Singapore Statement on Research Integrity, and internationally accepted standards for academic publishing.
These policies apply to all participants involved in the publication process, including authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher.
1. Research Integrity
Authors must ensure that submitted manuscripts are:
- original and unpublished;
- scientifically rigorous and accurate;
- based on honest and ethical research practices;
- free from fabrication, falsification, and data manipulation;
- appropriately cited where the work of others is used.
Any form of research misconduct is strictly prohibited.
2. Authorship
Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial scholarly contributions to the conception, design, execution, analysis, or writing of the work.
All listed authors must:
- approve the final manuscript;
- agree to its submission;
- accept responsibility for the integrity of the publication.
Guest, honorary, or ghost authorship is unacceptable.
3. Originality and Plagiarism
Submitted manuscripts must be original.
Authors must not submit work that:
- has been previously published;
- is simultaneously under consideration elsewhere;
- contains plagiarized or improperly attributed material.
All submissions may be screened using plagiarism-detection software before peer review.
4. Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Authors may use AI-assisted tools only to improve language, grammar, or formatting.
Authors remain fully responsible for:
- originality;
- factual accuracy;
- interpretation of findings;
- citations;
- ethical compliance.
Artificial intelligence systems may not be listed as authors.
5. Data Transparency
Authors should retain research data supporting their findings and provide access where appropriate, subject to ethical, legal, or confidentiality considerations.
6. Conflict of Interest
Authors, editors, and reviewers must disclose any financial, institutional, professional, or personal interests that could influence the publication process.
Where conflicts exist, appropriate measures will be taken to ensure an impartial editorial decision.
7. Ethical Approval
Research involving human participants, personal data, interviews, surveys, or sensitive information must comply with applicable ethical standards and obtain approval from an appropriate ethics committee where required.
Authors should indicate ethical approval and informed consent within the manuscript when applicable.
8. Peer Review
All eligible manuscripts undergo:
- Editorial Screening
- Internal Editorial Review
- Double-Anonymous External Peer Review
Editorial decisions are based solely on scholarly merit, originality, methodological quality, and relevance to the scope of the series.
9. Duties of Editors
Editors are responsible for:
- making fair and unbiased editorial decisions;
- maintaining confidentiality;
- avoiding conflicts of interest;
- ensuring publication ethics are followed;
- handling allegations of misconduct appropriately.
Editors evaluate manuscripts solely on academic merit without discrimination.
10. Duties of Reviewers
Reviewers are expected to:
- provide objective and constructive evaluations;
- maintain confidentiality;
- declare conflicts of interest;
- identify relevant published work not cited;
- report suspected ethical concerns to the editorial office.
Reviewers must not use unpublished material for personal advantage.
11. Corrections and Retractions
Where significant errors or misconduct are identified after publication, the publisher may issue:
- Corrections
- Expressions of Concern
- Retractions
- Removals (in exceptional legal circumstances)
These actions follow internationally accepted publication ethics procedures.
12. Copyright and Licensing
Authors retain copyright unless otherwise agreed.
The publisher receives a non-exclusive license to publish, distribute, and archive the work.
Open Access publications are licensed according to the selected Creative Commons license.
13. Complaints and Appeals
Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a written explanation to the Series Editor.
Complaints concerning editorial processes, ethical matters, or reviewer conduct will be investigated confidentially and fairly following COPE recommendations.
14. Publication Misconduct
The following constitute publication misconduct:
- Plagiarism
- Duplicate publication
- Fabricated or falsified data
- Image manipulation
- Citation manipulation
- Undisclosed conflicts of interest
- Authorship manipulation
- Peer-review manipulation
Confirmed misconduct may result in rejection, correction, retraction, or notification of the relevant institution.
15. Commitment to Ethical Publishing
The Future Governance Systems (FGS) Book Series is committed to promoting responsible research, editorial independence, transparency, and scholarly excellence. All participants in the publication process are expected to uphold these principles to ensure the credibility and integrity of the academic record.
References
This policy is informed by internationally recognized publication ethics frameworks, including:
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) – Core Practices.
- Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (World Conferences on Research Integrity).
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) – Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work (for authorship principles).
- Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing (joint guidance developed by COPE and partner organizations).








